The .223 Solution

Note: Any link highlighted in yellow is a link that, if you make that purchase, supports me financially (gas-money levels at this point).  Any link highlighted in cyan is a link to another post of mine.  And about my essays… Volume I of my essays are compiled here.  Volume II is being worked on… and my last five essays/posts are here:

Also check out my latest QUICK HITS linkfest, and my CARTOONS.

Lastly, please consider visiting people who pay me a (small) amount when you buy from them through me.

Amazon – Everything under the sun

Built Bar – Protein / nutrition bars

Pictures on Gold – Laser-engraved jewelry images

Wicked Temptations – Lingerie and other “unmentionables”

A Foreign Affair – How I met my wife: Women from Eastern Europe, Asia, and Latin America



Long-time readers, all three of you 😃, will have hopefully seen my despair as the US seemingly lurches towards a hot civil war – we already being in a cold one.  I pray daily for a way to be found that can – if not immediately heal – at least suture the rift between the Left and Right in this country until a way can be found to truly mend fences.  In this I echo Peter Grant; "So what can I, personally, do about this mess?" (links in original):
During my active days as a pastor, I was often asked to counsel couples having difficulties in their marriage.  A frequent complaint from one or both parties was, "I'm not getting what I expected/needed/wanted out of my marriage."  My instant response was always, "Well, what are you putting into your marriage?"  The Biblical standards are tried and tested.  "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."  "As you sow, so shall you reap."

Peter goes on (link in original, bolding added):
Tragically, the pressures on our overcrowded, debt-ridden, pressurized society are leading to more and more rigidity and extremism on all sides.  The acronym TINVOWOOT is heard more and more often, and many have already made the decision to resist, rather than try to contribute to a democratic solution.  I fear the consequences of such radicalization, because I've seen them before:  and therefore I'll work as hard as I can to be a voice of reason, as long as that's possible.  I have little confidence that those of us trying to do that will succeed in changing anyone's mind . . . but that doesn't mean it's not worthwhile to try.

Thus, my blog.  Thus, my comments in meatspace.  Thus, my nudging under my own name on, for example, LinkedIn.  I have thankfully not had Peter’s personal experience (italics in original, bolding added):
I daresay I've seen, with my own two eyes, literally thousands of dead bodies, maimed victims, physically and mentally injured and scarred survivors.  When extremes collide, there may be a 'victor', but both sides in an internal conflict are usually so deeply wounded by their clash that the nation as a whole never recovers, or takes generations to do so. 

I do have, however, a wide-ranging sense of history, am well-read, and understand just how far down the slope of progress things can go if CW2 kicks off in earnest.  So what can I do to avoid the above?  If someone knows more, please tell me.  There is only one option I refuse to consider – surrender – and President Reagan’s strong words apply just as well to the Left in America as the Communists in the former USSR:

[U.S. Armed Forces - We Must Fight - President Reagan (HD) 2015 / 3:06]

And in re-viewing this video, Reagan’s words about the dangers of appeasement apply just as well to today’s RINOs and NeverTrumpers in their appeasement of the Democrats as to the Liberals about the USSR.


In my essay The Shunning I described how I am essentially dead to my late mother’s side of the family… and I suspect, given that they’re Democrats all, it’s political.  In a recent time period, I tried to call one of my younger relatives out on the Left coast, both to say hello and inquire how the memorial for his late father went (if you’ve read that essay just above, you know I had been waiting for news of that memorial as I’d have liked to attend; I expect to learn, if I ever talk with him, that I was not notified of its schedule nor invited).  He messaged me that it was not a good time and that he’d call me back “tomorrow” – well, it’s been two-plus weeks of tomorrows and nothing.  These are people I’ve known most of my life.  If I can’t talk with them about anything, even casually, never mind reasonably discuss political differences, then with whom can I talk?


I read local newspaper op-ed pieces online; also some college newspapers including my alma mater.  Some of the letters I see from libs are mind-boggling 180 degree inversions of reality.  Others are frothing-at-the-mouth attacks on anyone to the Right of Stalin.  I see posts on “climate change” which demonstrate a staggering lack of knowledge on the topic.  When I attempt to even ask questions in the comments, I am shouted down, despite the fact that as a STEM professional I know a metric f*ckton more about the scientific method, and statistics of the claims of “warmest year on record”, than they do.  Their comebacks are literally rote replies, cant spewed out without any understanding.

In person or via email with people I know, I try low-key discussions which rapidly escalate to them running away (sometimes with them screaming raaaacist or some such, sometimes just rapid disengagement).  Why?  I’m assaulting their faith.  I am, by daring to questioning what they believe even with evidence, undermining their belief of themselves as good people, a belief supported because they hold certain views.  Change those views that are foundational to their self-perception of them as good people, they cease being good people in their minds - never mind in the minds of their fellow herd-beasts (few have the strength to withstand being shunned).  Hence my Teflon Intellects series:

One such example, whom I mentioned in the above essays, is a liberal blogger whose education and intellect and life-experience are – in general – quite admirable.  This is not a stupid person.  But regardless of the argumentation, regardless of the evidence I present, they spurn it as “racist” and finally stopped letting me comment at all.  The same, now, with the newspaper at my alma mater which has systematically shut down and refused to approve any comment I now make on anything on the website.

I recently saw on LinkedIn a person commenting about the current impeachment effort.  That person gave what I thought was a succinct but pointed critique of the Dem effort, to which a liberal commenter said “Get Putin’s d*ck out of your mouth”!  Charming… bet he’s fun at parties too.

Added: Or consider this thread, where David Karson (whose employer should hear about his comments) made this statement:

Also fun at parties… bet he can sing The Internationale perfectly.

I recently shared a link about anti-Semitism with Jews I know... which was on a Right-leaning website.  What happened?  Crickets mostly, but one was a dismissive "Thanks for sharing" from an American-born Jew, and the one that bothered me was an attack back - not on the merits of the article, but on the fact that there was an anti-impeachment ad on the website, so therefore it was a "hate site" not worthy of being read.  C'mon!  If there's one thing we Jews should be able to discuss, it's this!  Interestingly, the one Jew that replied positively was a former co-worker who, having fled the USSR, understood what Leftist anti-Semitism is, and asked what we could do to fight it.


(HT Gorges)

Speaker Pelosi, and many others on the Left, are now, essentially, saying that the 2016 election doesn’t count, and they need to affect the 2020 election by impeaching President Trump beforehand.  In other words, they are the elite Philosopher-Kings and you 63 million Deplorables are just too stupid and duped to decide for yourselves what you want in a leader; Pelosi Claims Letting the Election Decide About Trump Is Dangerous:

Nancy Pelosi might as well change her job description to “Speaker of Arrogance” She revealed no concern for the Constitution at all when she said: “The weak response to these [impeachment] hearings has been, ‘Let the election decide.’ That dangerous position only adds to the urgency of our action, because POTUS is jeopardizing the integrity of the 2020 election.

Why Nancy, because he will win?

So to review: Pelosi thinks that allowing people to vote for the President is a “dangerous position.” She even claimed that the “facts were uncontested.” She is delusional and is waging a war against the United States. President Trump has never “jeopardized” the integrity of the elections. She and her Democrat cronies have, however. Apparently, she’s never actually read the Constitution or wants to twist it to her own liking.

They are openly attempting to disenfranchise everyone who supported Trump; Attempted Theft In Progress:

The people behind impeachment have been declaring their intention to impeach Trump since before he was elected, before he was sworn in, and ever since. Their tools have been a concerted effort to paralyze the executive branch until they could find something, anything to impeach; the mainstream media have been crucial, willing, and knowing participants in creating a permanent frenzied news cycle and hunting for the excuse. Poisonous characters in the highest echelons of the FBI played a central role.

The excuses to steal the 2016 election have varied over time, and are completely pretextual: The ‘unfairness’ of the Electoral College; the Russia collusion hoax; the Mueller Inquisition; the Emoluments Clause; and the 25th Amendment delusion, among others.

The result in House committees controlled by Democrats, and likely the full House vote, was preordained. The hearings have been a charade, the window dressing, with rank speculation, supposition, opinions, hurt feelings, and bureaucratic turf battles posing as evidence.

The thieves disabled the alarm system by manipulating and selectively leaking closed-door testimony, and by refusing to allow Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee to call the witnesses they wanted to call during the public portion. It was a show trial manipulated by Adam Schiff with Nancy Pelosi’s blessing.

Jim Jordan had it right. Democrats have not accepted the outcome of the 2016 election. That’s what the past three years of impeachment fever have been about.

They’re not willing to let you vote for who you want; Democrat Impeachment Hearings are About Stopping You from Re-Electing Donald Trump:

They’re convinced you will re-elect Donald Trump. Rather than accept that, they are prepared to embarrass themselves and the nation to remove him from office — your president.

Ultimately, they are going to unleash a storm they cannot imagine as they raze the Rule of Law to the ground under the pretense of saving it.  This play’s scene is prescient and applies perfectly:

[A Man for All Seasons - The Devil Speech / 0:52]


In the excellent books A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles and The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy the intellectual titan Dr. Thomas Sowell discusses the concept that our liberal opposites truly believe themselves to be better, more noble, and more enlightened people.  Thus, their clear disdain for anyone who does not believe as they do.  As Sowell notes:

Consider, as one of myriad - nay, inexhaustible - examples; UC Berkeley instructor calls rural Americans 'bad people who have made bad life decisions’ (links in original):

A UC Berkeley graduate student and instructor took to Twitter on Wednesday to vent about his repulsion for rural Americans and why they deserve to live "uncomfortable" lives.

"They, as a group, are bad people who have made bad life decisions," he said in the since-deleted tweet. "Some, I assume, are good people. But this nostalgia for some imagined pastoral way of life is stupid and we should shame people who aren't pro-city."

According to Campus Reform, the Twitter thread started with Kernion advocating against affordable health care solutions for rural Americans, saying that "Rural Healthcare Should be expensive! And that expense should be borne by those who choose rural America!"

"Same goes for rural broadband. And gas taxes," he argued. "It should be uncomfortable to live in rural America. It should be uncomfortable to not move."

Given the crime, defecation, needles on the streets, even diseases, that seem to be metastasizing in cities from coast to coast, I would argue that it is this guy who is making poor decisions.  But if he wants to live in a city, that’s fine - unlike him I don't have a drive to "nudge" another person's choices.  I live out, and not as far out as I’d like (but the wife would object as she is a big city person and where we live is a compromise; I remember one day, after we visited New York City with her visiting sister, she asked – after gushing how much she loooooooved it – what I would do if she moved there and my response was simple: “I would miss you”.)

But individual choices are not the point.  This person is typical of Sowell’s anointed; not having the intellectual flexibility to conceive that other people might have different perspectives and priorities – and thus choose to live differently.  Since I choose differently, I cannot merely be different, I must be wrong, and in his mind and those of his fellow towering intellects, punished for being wrong.  Nor can these people – these ossified intellects – wrap their minds around the idea that people come to different political conclusions for honest reasons.

Again citing Sowell, part of this stems from the idea that to prove they are above the hoi polloi, they must believe differently than those whom they disdain.  If the common man believes in merit, loves their country, worships in a church or synagogue or temple (in general believing in a higher power), believes in male-female marriage and fidelity within a marriage, life begins at conception, etc., then they – to prove they are different – must embrace the opposite.  In this, Sowell and Evan Sayet think very much alike; Regurgitating the Apple: How Modern Liberals "Think":

The Modern Liberal will invariably side with evil over good, wrong over right, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success. Give the Modern Liberal the choice between Saddam Hussein and the United States, and he will not only side with Saddam Hussein; he will slander America and Americans in order to do so. Give him the choice between the vicious mass murderer corrupt terrorist dictator Yasser Arafat and the tiny and wonderful democracy of Israel, and he will plagia­rize maps, forge documents, engage in blood libels--as did our former President Jimmy Carter-- to side with the terrorist organizations and to attack the tiny democracy of Israel.

It's not just foreign policy; it's every policy. Given the choice between promoting teenage abstinence and teenage promiscuity--and believe me, I know this from my hometown of Hollywood--they will use their movies, their TV shows, their songs, even the schools to promote teenage promiscuity as if it's cool: like the movie American Pie, in which you are a loser unless you've had sex with your best friend's mother while you're still a child. Conversely, NARAL, a pro-abortion group masquerading as a pro-choice group, will hold a fund-raiser called "'F' Abstinence." (And it's not just "F." It's the entire word, because promoting vulgarity is part of their agenda.)

I, myself, was very liberal in my youth.  I’ve changed on fundamental levels, but these didn’t come about because of a Russian propaganda post, or mind waves from the “sky being” as some atheists deride Hashem, but rather a series of events sparking significant investigation and thought – documented in my “One Jew’s Red Pill Journey” series:

Part I     Part II     Part III     Part IV     Part V     Part VI


The violence against anyone to the Right of Stalin is ongoing.  The other day I wore my RJC Trump kippa… I was actually worried.  Fortunately nothing happened, but now I wonder what will happen, as the election season truly gets going in mid-2020, when I wear these (purchased in Israel where Trump is tremendously popular):

I should not have to be worried about wearing something declaring my support for President Trump.  (Nor, on the flip side, should a person supporting a Democrat have such a fear – at least, not in the America for which I yearn.)

This time the disturbing call for violence comes from a teacher in Tennessee, identified as David Mosley from Byrns Darden Elementary School in Clarksville.

Mosley reportedly said that liberals should “shoot” anyone who supports the president.

They not just say it, they attempt it – most notable being the attempted assassination of Republican Congressmen.  It’s very clear that they hate us and want to kill us.  And – gag me for saying this or giving him any credit but I must – when former President Obama attempts to pull them back (whether out of genuine concern or tactical shrewdness is unclear, but I’m opting for the latter… but at least he said it) – they double-down on pushing hard Left.  Marxists in various forms have murdered over 100 million people.  They discussed murdering 25 million Americans after their planned Communist take-over; Larry Grathwohl: Requiem for an American Hero (bolding added):

They also believed that their immediate responsibility would be to protect against what they called the counter revolution and they felt that this counter revolution could best be guarded against by creating and establishing reeducation centers in the Southwest where would take all the people who needed to be reeducated into the new way of thinking and teach them how things were going to be.

I asked, well, what is going to happen to those people that we can’t reeducate that are diehard capitalists and the reply was that they’d have to be eliminated. And when I pursued this further they estimated that they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these reeducation centers. And when I say eliminate I mean kill – 25 million people.

I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people most of which have graduate degrees from Columbia and other well known educational centers and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people and they were dead serious.”

They want to do so now, and state so openly.  Any wonder why I cling bitterly to my guns; A Very Personal Opposition to Gun Control?


Are there some on the Right who actually want “it” to start?  Yes.  They’re idiots.

Are there some on the Left who actually want “it” to start?  Yes.  They’re idiots too.

Civil wars are always things to be feared and avoided if possible.  Though, personally, my bet is on the Right winning… eventually.  See here:

This, of course, assumes that “outside actors” don’t act.  Personally, if I were an outside agent, most notably China or Russia, once the US was fully consumed and focused inward I’d EMP CONUS, then throw some nukes at major cities to kick the corpse.  But even assuming this didn’t happen, even if the world didn’t also rip itself apart settling ancient scores but muddled on until America got itself straightened out, how many would die?  There would be no power, there would be no food shipments or water or working toilets or hospitals, and there would be whole swaths of cities burned out.  Untold millions would die.  What sane person wants that?

In a great column that I cited in The Blue Virus, Professor Walter E. Williams proposes a divorce; Parting Company

I believe our nation is at a point where there are enough irreconcilable differences between those Americans who want to control other Americans and those Americans who want to be left alone that separation is the only peaceable alternative. Just as in a marriage where vows are broken, our rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution have been grossly violated by a government instituted to protect them. These constitutional violations have increased independent of whether there's been a Democrat-controlled Washington or a Republican-controlled Washington.

Short of a miraculous coming-to-their-senses by the Left, this would be my preferred choice short of some kind of reconciliation.  It would be, of course, a Herculean undertaking.  Where would the line be drawn?  How would commerce and travel be handled?  What about people who had to cross for work, or telecommuted?  How would relocations be handled (and I have no doubt we’d have to move)?  Thorny issue after thorny issue.  Brexit’s difficulties on a vastly larger scale… still better than all-out war, but an immense undertaking nonetheless.

But would it really work?  Remember what I keep hammering: Leftists are MISSIONARIES.  Even if, mirabile dictu, a relatively peaceful separation were to be effected with all the issues settled, they would look upon our side and start strategizing their new efforts to conquer it and claim it for the great Socialist Utopia.  Filled with Marxianic Zeal, they would immigrate.  They would infiltrate.  They would influence.  Slowly-slowly, with the patience born of decades of prior efforts, even if it took centuries the new, freedom-loving area would find themselves in a similar situation as before; The Left Won’t Allow a Peaceful Separation:

A peaceful separation requires some mutual respect and concern for the flourishing of the other. The Left, like crazed primitives engaged in honor killing, would instead exact revenge and command forced association rather than allow a divorce. The Left would be embarrassed and discredited if their ideology were rejected by the group it is supposedly benefiting with the promise of diversity, equality, and progress. Nailing shut the exits is a deliberate part of the Left’s utopian quest for uniformity and expansive labeling of all of its opinions and policies as nonnegotiable “human rights.”

[T]here is little reason to think they would allow the resources, wealth, and people of the “red states” to leave peacefully. After all, if the departing group were seeking to build a country to preserve its traditional notions of government and culture, it would be a regressive force, undoubtedly labeled hateful and racist simply for wanting to keep things the way they are. For the Left, like the Puritans of Salem, it would be better if we burned at the stake.

We would be a nation of heretics in their eyes, requiring – demanding – that they convert us even if we had pulled away.  Thus hopes for a peaceful separation are, to quote Gandalf, a fool’s hope.  Prayers – Hashem is always there, but he speaks with the small, still voice now.  So, what about the Talmud?

“When someone comes to kill you, arise and kill them first (Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 72a)”

The question is when that moment truly is ripe, and more importantly righteous, to arise.  It’s not here… yet.


“America is at that awkward stage; it's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.”

That awkward stage will, I fear, end soon.  What will trigger “it”?  Will it be the House impeachment and Senate conviction of President Trump, thus demonstrating that the Deep State is ascendant and people truly grasp the line has been crossed and that we are no longer a Sovereign People but rather a Ruled one?  As Her Heinous the Crone of Chappaqua, Brennan, Clapper, Barackus Rex, and all the others laugh "Guilty as sin and free as a bird"! like Obama's "some guy in the neighborhood" Bill Ayers as he was set free on a prosecutorial screw-up?

Will it be an openly and in-your-face stolen election as vote fraud is blatantly committed to defeat Trump in 2020… with the vote counters and enemedia laughing as ballot box after ballot box are “found” to tilt the scales, and California's ballot harvesting tactic - which undoubtedly flipped numerous Red districts Blue - is effected on a national scale?

Will it be the coming financial collapse, whether starting here in America or overseas; I Feel Like Sarah Connor: The Coming Financial Collapse.

(HT Gorges)

Or if ANTIFA decides throwing punches, milkshakes, or bags of urine is not enough, and what they upgrade to maims or kills?  Or any of Hashem-knows-how-many potential causes starts the avalanche. Because once it starts…

[The avalanche has already started; It is too late for the pebbles to vote. / 0:08]

Be prepped.  Be ready.  Understand – as I do – you will probably not live through it.  But stand prepared to do your worst to them until that day when you can do no more. 

[Show them no mercy / 0:10]


Let me close by stating, as clearly as I possibly can: I do not want civil war.  Unlike some yahoos on both sides, I do not want brother against brother, neighbor against neighbor, for I know full well it would be far, far worse than the last one.  And now – with nations abroad with the capability to end us while we are distracted – the dangers multiply into truly dread territory.

But we didn’t start this.  If there is one, small, cold comfort should “it” start – when “it” starts – it is that we were perfectly willing to coexist with civil disagreement and honest debate, weighing and testing philosophies in the marketplace of ideas.  They weren’t, but rather insisted we obey; The voice of… reason?:

See, the REAL problem here is not that we need to learn to “share a country with assholes you can’t stand.” We’ve been doing that very thing for a good, long while now. No, the REAL problem is that YOU’RE the assholes who can’t seem to manage it. Not without trying to control our every move, thought, and habit via government force, you can’t. You’ve spent more than half a century trying to compel us into bending the knee and obeying—insulting us every step of the way, incrementally asserting illegitimate authority while denouncing us as “immoral” and “uncaring” and “intolerant,” when we are patently NOT any of those things.

So, Bill, here’s the deal. You don’t get to go diligently beavering away at ripening the conditions for civil war or other violent uprising, and then wring your hands raw about how it’s us that needs to be more “reasonable” and tolerant, which is what you’re tacitly doing here. You don’t get to attack, ridicule, and condemn people guilty of nothing at all—not just very occasionally, but incessantly, for years and years—without eventually inspiring a backlash to your abuse. Even the most docile, fearful hound will suddenly whirl to bite the hand that beats him sooner or later. When it finally happens, you don’t get to act all shocked and surprised about it.

You brought civil war to our doorstep—in the case of your PantiFa animals going after Tucker Carlson, literally so. Now you’re worried that we might hurl some back your way. Well, I can’t honestly say your distress concerns me even slightly. I’m way more inclined to feel that one reaps what one sows. And harvest-time for what you and yours have done, not just to us personally, but to our country, is due and past due.

To quote one of the Karate Kid movies:

Fighting not good.  Someone always get hurt.  But if must fight… win.

I tell my kids:if you must fight then win thoroughly so they know they lost.  The same applies here.  It's not time yet (and I still have a fool's hope it will never come).  But if my fears are realized we need to be ready to administer the .223 solution… liberally.


Not alone in my fears about what would happen if Trump were removed – a video at Bastion of Liberty: A Frightening Prediction From A Sober, Sensible Man.



  1. I am an agnostic, so I have not dog in this fight but I am a proud FOI. I first noticed the rabid
    antisemitism on the left back in the early eighties. I had a coworker who insisted on playing
    NPR on the radio at work. Even that far back, the left made common cause with Arafat and
    the PLO, and praised every communist dictator on the planet. I am pleased that a lot of
    Jews have joined the Jexodus and Walk Away movements.

    As an aside, I used to work in a paper mill where the resident mill geezer was a 75 year old
    Croatian. He married the daughter of the former Croatian minister of transportation. Andreja
    Artukovich was the one who transported close to a million Jews, Serbians and Roma to the
    death camps. He was a dottering old coot with the IQ of a doorknob, so most people did
    not take him very seriously. He went on a vacation and I learned about his past while he
    was away. When he returned, I gave him the cold shoulder and he played right into my
    hands. He asked me if I was Jew. I said yes, I am a very devout Jew. I placed a Star
    of David sticker on my tool box and bought a Harvey Magilla dancing Rabbi doll and
    offered him proof that I was circumsized.

    I LOVE toying with stupid people!

  2. I'm loading my Weatherby.

    See you on the barricades.

  3. I spent over thirty years working overseas. I've seen civil wars, revolutions, and all the ills and afflictions the devil inflicts on humanity that come dressed in all manner of titles. The lesson I learned is that when someone calls you "deplorable and irredeemable" he means it. The next step is a vacation at a nice government facility complete with showers. If violence breaks out, it will not be a war under any sort of rules but murder on a scale no one can imagine with every nut set free to enjoy his lust for blood, murder and mayhem.

    In such a situation I will insure those dear to me survive and all who represent a threat are eliminated. I will not tolerate a cancer, I will not compromise with leprosy; I will not negotiate with AIDS. Those that aid and abet such fanatics will deserve no mercy for they have labored for years to destroy those institutions and traditions that allow a civil society to thrive. They knew what they were doing. They knew what the end result would be. They sowed the seeds for the circumstances that are coming. Should they and theirs not reap what they have nourished for so long?

    Why the Left's frantic efforts to disarm the populace? Why the importation of millions of people that hate America? The Left has decided to "fundamentally change" America. They mean to destroy it and wear its skin as a suit.

    I think the response they will get is not what they were taught they might receive in gender studies class or at the ACLU organizing classes. The people who fund these groups are known and will not survive, nor their choirmasters in academia, the leftstream media, or Wall Street/Silicon Valley and especially in the swamp in DC.

    This election will see more fraud, violence, and finally terrorism than we have seen since the 1970s. And just as all those revolutions failed and all those groups collapsed, we will see a purge of society like we haven't seen since the 1920s.

  4. Good stuff, I especially like "EMP CONUS."


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Open Letter to a Politically-Conservative Jewish Friend

Gratuitous Rule Five Friday: Pretty Faces