Big Conspiracy: Electing a New Population

In my essay The Big Conspiracy: Introduction I introduced a concept, inspired by the phrase “the Big Lie” as mastered by Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi Propaganda Minister, who wrote:

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."

To refresh your understanding of the Big Conspiracy as I defined it:

A plan so audacious in scope and scale, with an intent so sweeping, that even when told about it by people with personal experience in it or presented with strong evidence supporting the exposure, the average person will refuse to believe it because it is that big.

So haul out the foil and fashion a hat.  Here’s the first one.


It’s been joked that if illegal aliens voted for Republicans, every able-bodied Democrat would be on the border helping to build a wall.  (Buy the mug, buy the mug!)

Except it’s no joke.  They’ve been at this for a while… in America, since 1965.  And they used to be open about it (bolding added):

Although liberals pretend to have no idea where conservatives got the idea that immigration was designed to change the country and bring in new voters, they weren’t always so modest.

In a 1998 article for Cornell University’s Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, Democratic political consultant Patrick Reddy exulted that the 1965 immigration act was “the Kennedy family’s greatest gift to the Democratic Party.” Changing the country’s demographics through immigration would be “George McGovern’s revenge,” liberal political strategist Ruy Teixeira announced 16 years ago — and then celebrated as a fait accompli upon Obama’s election in 2008.

In England, the Elites have been at it for a while too.  From 2009, Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser, a critical sentence (bolding added):

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country

And France (bolding added):

L'Express explains that “some relativize, recalling that France is traditionally a country of immigration. They are right and wrong. The reason is that our country has welcomed foreigners significantly for about one hundred and fifty years. Wrong, because this movement has marked a great break with the fifteen centuries that preceded it. Between the fall of the Roman Empire and the mid-nineteenth century, the base of the French population remained, in fact, surprisingly stable”.

In twenty years, the French Muslim population is supposed to have increased by 25 percent according to the lowest estimates, by 50 percent for the median estimates, by 100 percent if we compare the Insee figures and the government from 1997 to 2014, jumping from 3 to 6 million.

And why?  Votes to remain in power; English intellectuals and their loathing of England: (bolding added)

Mass immigration … has had as its purpose the production of a permanent change in the nature of the British population, which can be relied upon to vote for ever for the kind of politicians who brought it about. It is one thing to encourage immigration because your commerce is so strong that there is a labour shortage; quite another when neither of those conditions obtains. Britain’s commerce was never strong and there never was a labour shortage. The country imported people while there was still mass unemployment (disguised as sickness) to create a vote bank for those who brought this about.

Votes again, because what the Left is offering, Militant Normals don’t want; just like normal people don’t want Turkey Coconut Bouillon with Nutmeg and Omega 3:

Demographics is destiny. The left is reshaping countries to match its demographic targets. It is turning nations into one great gerrymandered district composed of populations that are more likely to support it. It is doing this using immigration, economics, social policy and every tool at its disposal. And if conservatives don't start understanding the demographic game of thrones, then they will lose the war.

It's all about importing a new majority to give power to Democrats.

Yes, Americans and Europeans are waking up to what’s happening. 

[Europeans Are Waking Up! | How Even Ordinary People Are Beginning to Take Action Against Immigration / 4:47]

But meanwhile, European elites are doubling down to accelerate the replacement to combat – and then swamp – this resistance (link in original):

The aim is to “institutionalise mass migration at an international level” to facilitate the Global Compact For Migration, which the U.S. backed away from last year, noting that it undermines a nation’s sovereignty. Avramopoulos asserted that mass migration cannot be stopped, and dismissed the rise of so-called “populist” leaders — those leaders who aim to protect their national security and the freedom of their societies. For example, the Visegrad group (Hungary, Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia), Austria, and Italy have resisted mass migration due to the chaos evident in open-border countries such as Sweden, Germany and France.

But we need to understand something fundamental about our opponents; two things actually:

  1. Leftists have a LONG GAME.  They’ve got their eyes set 10, 20, 50, 100 years down the road… while we look forward to the next election and then think we can relax.
  2. Leftists are missionaries; they truly believe they can create heaven on earth.  They believe this with the same level of faith I have in G-d.  They are seeking it, all their thought is bent on it…

So slip on your Leftist moccasins for a minute: if you believed – believed! – that you could create heaven on earth with no hunger, or war, or poverty, or crime, or hatred… wouldn’t you work with all your heart for it?  And in parallel, wouldn’t you start viewing both people who opposed you, as well as the culture to which they belonged, as evil for trying to stop such a thing?

Remember that it’s not so large a step from seeing someone as evil

Evil. Understand this. They view us as evil. Evil people who push grandma off cliffs. Evil people who starve babies, break up families, and who want to strip-mine the earth and are indifferent to the survival of every living thing. Evil people who want slavery, who want gays executed, and who want to consign women to perpetual slavery in the kitchen, bedroom, and delivery room. (To copy an internet meme, when did we become Muslims?)

… to taking steps to eliminate that evil (bolding added):

And so Mr. Hodgkinson, a staunch Bernie Sanders supporter and avowed left-wing activist, following months and years of hearing his ideological leaders malign and defame Republicans and conservatives, made the horrific decision to do what seemed the logical thing to do, given the “crimes” of these Republicans. He would grab his weapons and descend upon these “vile” GOP congressmen, becoming their judge, jury, and executioner. He would do what others could only bring themselves to verbalize, whether through innuendo, jest, theatrical drama, or outright threats. He would carry through. He would extinguish their lives and, in so doing, he would finally mete out the only justice these “immoral” Republicans were worthy of — destruction and death.

And what better way to eliminate that evil than to wipe the very culture (and in parallel, race) that has “done so much evil” from the earth?

But you can only do this if you have governmental power.  So you need new voters to ensure you get – and keep – that power.


[Ann Corcoran on Refugee Resettlement / 4:00]

And it’s not just the refugees.  It’s not just illegals.  It’s chain migration.  Each new “resident” can bring fathers, mothers, sisters, brothers, children… Chain Migration Expected to Add 8M Potential Foreign-Born Voters to U.S. Electorate over Next Two Decades (bolding added, link in original):

Research by University of Maryland, College Park political scientist James Gimpel has found in recent years that more immigrants to the U.S. inevitably means more Democrat voters and thus, increasing electoral victories for the Democratic Party.

We’re already hearing that the population of illegal immigrants in the US may be far higher than the official figures:

The authors from Yale School of Management, Mohammad M. Fazel-Zarandi, Jonathan S. Feinstein, Edward H. Kaplan, said the average in their new model is about 22 million, exactly twice the number accepted by the Census Bureau and other experts.

“The mean estimate based on our simulation analysis is 22.1 million, essentially double the current widely accepted estimate,” they wrote.


If you listen to what the EUrocrats say, it’s like they’re absolutely desperate to swamp the Western nations with third world immigrants.  Just like, as the EU was forming, the nations that had referenda and voted NO were told to vote again, the EUrocrats are telling the West they have no choice.  (Links in the original, bolding added):

Last month, French President Emmanuel Macron threatened sanctions against the EU member states that refuse to accept immigrants. “I am in favor of sanctions being imposed in the event of no cooperation” on migrant relocation, Macron said. Former German Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel has also favored similar sanctions against Hungary and other EU countries unwilling to “shoulder the burden” and accept their “fair share” of immigrants.

Just imagine the self-loathing required to think this; The Problem with Ireland? It's 'Too Irish':

It's all part of a push by the EU and the EU-philic Irish government to diminish nationalism by eradicating it at the roots: the ethnicity of the native people and their faith.

The aim is clear: since the current population believes “wrongly” – i.e., has their own culture and ethnic group - and won’t vote “correctly”, elect a new population.

The Democrats actively attempted to prevent Vietnamese refugees from coming to the US; FLASHBACK: Democrats Tried To Block Thousands Of Vietnam War Refugees, Including Orphans (links in original):

National Public Radio host Debbie Elliott retraced Brown’s refusal to accept any refugees in a January 2007 interview with Taft. According to a transcript, which was aired on its flagship program, “All Things Considered,” Taft said, “our biggest problem came from California due to Brown.” She called his rejection of Vietnamese refugees “a moral blow.”

“I remember at the time we had thousands and thousands of requests from military families in San Diego, for instance, who had worked in Vietnam, who knew some of these people,” she told NPR.

Brown echoed his isolationist theme throughout his first term. As recounted by author Larry Clinton Thompson in his book, “Refugee Workers in the Indochina Exodus,” Brown said, “We can’t be looking 5,000 miles away and at the same time neglecting people who live here.”

At the same time as Brown was fighting Washington, Democrats waged an anti-refugee campaign inside the nation’s capital.

“One of the justifications that Ford gave was related to communism. He said these people are all fleeing communism, which was the same criteria that had been used for the Cubans, the Hungarians, other refugee groups that had been processed in the past,” Taft explained.

Similarly, the flood of refugees from collapsing-if-not-already-failed state Venezuela gets zero press.  Putting on my thinking cap… could the Left’s refusing of Vietnamese refugees, and Obama changing the rules on asylum seekers from Cuba, and the zero coverage of Venezuela’s refugee exodus let alone zero call for bringing them to the US have anything to do with these three sets of refugees having first-hand experience with the Socialism that the Left seeks to bring to America – and would thus have been a real-world, human-story counterweight to the Progressives Long March towards earthly utopia?  Magic Eight-Ball says…

(Image source)

And yet, if you bring up anything like this to any “thinking person” on the Left, you’ll get nothing but denials.  Heck, even a lot of mainstream Conservatives will likely say the same.  The Big Conspiracy at work.


Demographic tides are turning, and not in Conservatives’ favors in many countries.  Although this article is about America, it holds true across most first-world nations; Trump Is Up Against a Demographic Time Bomb (bolding added, link in original):

The truth is that Trump’s base essentially represents an older, English-speaking, white, evangelical Christian society whose supremacy is in its final throes. Soon these people will be outnumbered by Spanish-speaking Latinos, and they will be pushed aside politically by younger whites who are less religious and more liberal. They will be a minority in a country in which they were born the dominant culture. That is hard, and the pain and fear such a transition creates should not be dismissed.

In Europe – e.g., Germany and France – Muslim population growth is a relentless tide that will, unless something drastic happens, swallow the continent into the Caliphate – but before that, the Islamic invaders will vote for the Leftists who continue to coddle them and permit more to come in.  And the ongoing population explosion in Africa is a dire threat as well.


The first step in solving a problem is recognizing it.

The Left, whether in Europe or America, is desperate to dilute and weaken the voting block of natives with a new population – with the crystal-clear aim of creating a permanent majority voting block for that side of the spectrum.  In the short term, politicians that accomplished this Great Replacement will stay in power.  In the long term, they believe they’ll use that power to create their global Socialist Utopia.

I’m not saying I know all the answers, though I suspect the Spanish Solution will come into play. 

But understand – the Great Replacement is on.  The next step after awareness is to stop the flow; after that, to reverse it.  Then, the traitors that did this must be dealt with, on a person-by-person basis, whether in government or just private citizen advocates of this, e.g., G-d Damn You Barbara Spectre!  (I’ll volunteer to pull the gallows lever on her.  Hell, I’ll pay to do it.)

Lastly, once we’ve “solved” this, we must be vigilant lest such civilizational traitors rise again.


"I do not coexist with cancer; I do not find common ground with gangrene.  The Left must be fought and destroyed, or America dies."



  1. A truly cynical person would point out that the populations that are being imported have a far higher cultural tolerance for oligarchies.

    1. I'll bite, because I AM that cynical.

      The imported populations are completely accustomed to the third world system: he who has the gold makes the rules. They're used to corruption, bribes, etc.

      To the Left, that's not a bug, that's a feature, as they work to loot the rest of us.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The .223 Solution

An Open Letter to a Politically-Conservative Jewish Friend

G-d Damn You Barbara Spectre!